On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> I think a lot of people believe is a bad decision: we love the
> sophistication of debs and apt-get.
One of the many reasons I plan to try woody is to have a closer look at
the deb format. Currently, I have no idea how they differ from rpms either
in use, or in how they are generated and what capabilities they have.
apt-get is something that redhatters have also now anyway. Not dselect
though (not that I _really_ know what dselect is yet anyway)
Cheers,
Martin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu 20 Jun 2002 - 20:32:08 BST