Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT.

From: Andy Davidson (andyd@lug.org.uk)
Date: Sun 16 Jun 2002 - 22:47:03 BST

Previous message: Lee: "RE: [nottingham] Xinit Boxes"
In reply to: Lee: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Next in thread: Matthew Sackman: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Next in thread: Lee: "RE: [nottingham] Xinit Boxes"
Reply: Matthew Sackman: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sunday 16 June 2002 17:19, Lee wrote:
> on the other hand, can anyone tell my with the unix process INIT , is
> the same as the spoken nottingham slang for 'Isn't it'?

I'm not sure, but I think you're insane.

-- 
Andy Davidson  <andyd@lug.org.uk>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk                   http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk               http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Previous message: Lee: "RE: [nottingham] Xinit Boxes"
In reply to: Lee: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Next in thread: Matthew Sackman: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Next in thread: Lee: "RE: [nottingham] Xinit Boxes"
Reply: Matthew Sackman: "Re: [nottingham] Xinit Skip's INIT."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun 16 Jun 2002 - 22:47:30 BST