Re: [nottingham] Hi ho Hi ho, it's of to Qos we go.

• Previous message: Jon Masters: "Re: [nottingham] Weird machine"
• In reply to: Jon Masters: "Re: [nottingham] Hi ho Hi ho, it's of to Qos we go."
• Next in thread: Robert Davies: "Re: [nottingham] Hi ho Hi ho, it's of to Qos we go."
• Next in thread: Guangyue Liu: "Re: [nottingham] Weird machine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

ask sackman would say...

BOFH Excuses Board

RSVP reservation failed due to pre marital net split

;-)

Cheers,
Lee

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 13:35, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2002, Lee wrote:
>
> > ATM SUCKS! (no it really really does)
>
> > Client applications should be able to request qos from
> > end network infrastructure devices. bu I don't think server software
> > should get involved too, too too too complex.... ah well. More
> > features..that's ms way.
>
> Hmmm...need I say any more? ;-)
>
> Jon.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
> http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk
http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------

• Previous message: Jon Masters: "Re: [nottingham] Weird machine"
• In reply to: Jon Masters: "Re: [nottingham] Hi ho Hi ho, it's of to Qos we go."
• Next in thread: Robert Davies: "Re: [nottingham] Hi ho Hi ho, it's of to Qos we go."
• Next in thread: Guangyue Liu: "Re: [nottingham] Weird machine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed 24 Jul 2002 - 14:17:12 BST