On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Richard Nolan wrote:
> Graeme Fowler said :
> > Once again, sorry to be the tedious boring legality pointing-out person...
> > doesn't NTL explicitly forbid (and scan for) webservers and the like?
My understanding is that if the outgoing is that they don't care as long as
the ratio of downstream:upstream is greater than 6:1. Reversing that
sentence it might be understood that they /do/ care that is not the case.
Having said that; they don't really have the human resources to do much
other than collect monies these days do they. :-)
> Can't/don't you get more up on ADSL too? If you are serving any number
> of web pages, 128k is not that much no?
For those that know me, I can assure you that 128Kb serves *ALOT* of
web-pages. =-)
> uploading anything else to anywhere).. The last time I looked at
> demonadsl.co.uk, it was 250 (256?) k upwards..
Never quite sure; the underlying link is running at 288Kb
> And I do hate the intomki servers :)
Yes. However, I dread to think what the `service' would be like without
them!
-Paul
-- Nottingham, GB-------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.lug.org.uk http://www.linuxportal.co.uk http://www.linuxjob.co.uk http://www.linuxshop.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue 09 Apr 2002 - 12:03:12 BST